Manning was born in Edmonton, Alberta. He is the son of Muriel Aileen (née Preston) and Ernest Charles Manning, Social Credit Party Premier of Alberta from 1943 to 1968 and a Canadian Senator from 1970 to 2003. His grandparents (Preston’s) were English immigrants.
Manning grew up in the Garneau district of Edmonton but moved at age twelve with his parents to the family dairy farm east of Edmonton from which he attended a rural school – Horse Hill High School. He enrolled in the honors physics program at the University of Alberta in 1960, but switched after three years to economics and graduated in 1964 with a B. A. in Economics. He sought election to the Canadian House of Commons in the 1965 federal election as a candidate of the federal Social Credit Party, but was defeated.
Upon graduation from university, Manning briefly worked for a small, independent think tank – the National Public Affairs Research Foundation - which enabled him to work on quasi political projects of interest to himself and his father. One such project included the preparation of a proposal for re-aligning Alberta provincial politics through a proposed merger of the governing Social Credit Party with the up and coming Progressive Conservative Party led by Peter Lougheed. The proposal was ultimately rejected by the leadership of both parties but the statement of conservative principles it contained resurfaced time and time again in Manning’s subsequent political ventures – in the statement of principles contained in a book researched by him for Ernest Manning entitled in Political Realignment: A Challenge for Thoughtful Canadians and in the statements of principles of the Reform Party of Canada, the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance, and the Conservative Party of Canada.
In 1967, Manning married Sandra Lillian (nee Beavis), an accomplished musician and nursing student at the University of Alberta. Together they have five children and (as of 2018) eleven grandchildren. The Manning’s identify themselves as evangelical Christians and have attended a variety of Christian fellowships – Baptist, Christian and Missionary Alliance, Anglican, and Associated Gospel churches.
Preston Manning has described himself as “a great fan and imperfect follower of Jesus of Nazareth” and has studied and lectured extensively on managing the interface between faith and politics. In doing so, he draws upon a large reservoir of spiritual resources which includes the Judeo-Christian scriptures and reflects the influence of Augustine, Martin Luther, Jean Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley, William Wilberforce, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, William James, Abraham Kuyper, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Helmut Theilke, C. S Lewis, Malcolm Muggeridge, Billy Graham, James Houston, and Charles Price.
Manning and a colleague, Dr. Erick Schmidt, a PhD sociologist and Executive Secretary to the Alberta cabinet in the 1960s, became interested in the General Systems Theory of biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy and its possible application to governmental and business organizations. Together, Manning and Schmidt authored a White Paper on Human Resources Development for the Alberta government applying systems concepts to the reorganization of Alberta’s social services. It was presented to the Alberta legislature in 1968 and later formed the basis of Alberta’s Human Resources Development Authority and related programs under Premier Harry Strom, Ernest Manning’s successor. Manning also contributed to the development of a “socio-economic development model”for TRW Systems of Redondo Beach, California, as the firm was endeavoring to shift its focus from the systems management of military projects to the management of “civil systems”.
Over the next twenty years Manning continued to work as a management consultant using his firms – M and M Systems Research Ltd. and Manning Consultants Ltd. - to pursue projects of political relevance. These included the development of strategies to prevent investor owned utilities from being nationalized by their provincial governments; developing a model of federal provincial negotiations which enabled his firm to predict the outcomes of federal provincial conferences; and assisting energy companies to increase their hiring of aboriginal workers and purchases from aboriginal owned and operated companies. In an effort to stimulate economic growth in the depressed region of north central Alberta, Manning served for almost twenty years as the President and CEO of a duel objective – social and economic – enterprise named Slave Lake Developments Ltd (later renamed Spruceland Properties Ltd). When the company was finally sold in 2016 it distributed over $55 million in dividends to some 300 local shareholders – illustrating Manning’s belief that economic development could be more effectively stimulated in a depressed region by “a better distribution of the Tools of Wealth Creation” than by income redistribution schemes.
The Reform Party of Canada
In the mid 1980’s, Manning and his associates were becoming increasingly aware of a growing political discontent in Western Canada and growing disillusionment with the traditional federal political parties. Interest in western separatism was growing as well. In October 16, 1986, Manning convened a small meeting in Calgary of 5 people - himself, Dr. David Elton (a pollster and President of the Canada West Foundation), James Gray (a prominent Progressive Conservative and Calgary business man), and two oil sector lawyers, Bob Muir and Doug Hilland – to discuss the West’s political options. The group could not agree on a specific course of action but decided there would be merit in holding a conference in the spring of 1987 to develop a Western Political Agenda and to sponsor a debate on various means of advancing it.
A conference organizing and promotional group was assembled which now included several prominent but disillusioned Liberals, Stan Roberts a former Liberal MLA from Manitoba and Francis Winspear, a prominent Edmonton businessman who offered to help finance the conference. Ted Byfield, the publisher and editor of The Western Report, also became heavily involved in shaping the Western Agenda and in promoting what was now named The Western Assembly on Canada’s Economic & Political Future.”
In May, 1987, the Western Assembly was held in Vancouver. It adopted a short Western Political Agenda which included such proposals as balancing the federal budget, electing the Canadian Senate, entrenching economic rights, more vigorously pursuing free trade, and allowing more free votes in the House of Commons. The Assembly was also presented with three major options for advancing the Agenda – working through an existing federal party, forming a new western based interest or pressure group, or forming a new western based, federal political party – following in the footsteps of previous western based federal parties, the Progressive Party of Canada, the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the federal Social Credit party. Manning presented the case for the new party, the attendees voted 75% in favor of that option, and a resolution was passed to hold the Founding Convention for the new party in Winnipeg in the fall.
The proposed Founding Assembly was subsequently held in Winnipeg on October 30 to November 1, 1987. It resolved unanimously to create a new federal party based in the west, adopted a draft constitution and a platform embodying the Western Agenda, and chose to name itself, at Manning’s suggestion, the Reform Party of Canada.
One highlight of the Assembly was an address by Stephen Harper on the application of a “regional fairness criterion” to national decision making. Knowing that any new party would need a Policy Chief, Manning had approached Harper, then a graduate student in economics at the University of Calgary, and invited him to make a major presentation at the Winnipeg Assembly. Harper became the Reform Party’s Policy Chief and would later become Prime Minister of Canada.
The Founding Assembly concluded with the election of Diane Ablonczy, a Calgary lawyer, as Chair of the new party’s governing Council and Manning as Leader - after the only other candidate, Stan Roberts, dropped out of the leadership contest citing voting irregularities.
The major intellectual tradition which Manning brought to the new party was essentially that of classical conservatism derived from his study of the writings of Aristotle, Edmund Burke, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, Russell Kirk, George Grant, and Dr. Michael Walker.
The major political traditions upon which Manning drew most heavily were those of the Reform tradition of pre- Confederation Canada, namely, the writings and experiences of Baldwin and La Fontaine, leaders of the Reform Parties of Upper and Lower Canada; and Joseph Howe, leader of the Reform Party of Nova Scotia. Later examples included Louis Riel, the Metis Leader and Father of Manitoba; F. W. G Haultain, the last and greatest Premier of the old Northwest Territory, J. S Woodsworth, Thomas Crerar, and Agnes Campbell McPhail of the Progressive Party of Canada; Henry Wise Wood of the United Farmers of Alberta; Tommy Douglas of the CCF, and William Aberhart and Ernest Manning of the Social Credit Party.
In the November 1, 1988 federal election, both Harper and Manning were Reform Party candidates – Manning running in the federal riding of Yellowhead against former Prime Minister Joe Clark. In total, Reform ran 72 candidates, all of whom were defeated, although 15, including Manning and Harper, finished in second place. In 1989, however, Reform scored its first electoral victory when a by-election was held on March 13 in the federal riding of Beaver River and the Reform candidate, Deborah Grey was elected. Stephen Harper joined Ms. Grey in Ottawa as her Policy Advisor and Executive Assistant, while Manning continued to travel the country building the party.
These building efforts were relatively successful in Ontario and the West, but Manning’s efforts to plant the party in Quebec and points east were especially hampered by his inability to speak French and to present Reform as more than a regional party.
Between the 1988 and 1993 federal elections, two significant events helped to boost public awareness of Manning, the Reform Party, and the party’s organizational capabilities. The first was a province wide election in Alberta to choose a candidate to be recommended to the Governor General by the federal government for appointment to the Canadian Senate. Reform put forward Stan Waters, a prominent Calgary businessman, war hero, and former Lieutenant-General and Commander of the Canadian Armed Forces. He and Manning campaigned vigorously across the province and on election day, October 16, 1989, Waters received slightly more than 620,000 votes (41.7% of the total) – the largest electoral mandate ever received by a single candidate for a Canadian parliamentary office. On June 11, 1990, Waters was reluctantly recommended for appointment to the Senate by then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney where he (Waters) continued to campaign vigorously for Reform’s “Triple E Senate” – Elected, Equal, and Effective.
The second event which boosted awareness of Manning, Reform, and the party’s capacity to fight elections, was the Charlottetown Referendum campaign of 1992, one year before the 1993 federal election. The Charlottetown Accord was a package of amendments to the Canadian constitution, unanimously approved and endorsed by the Prime Minister and the Premiers. It included a variety of measure including constitutional recognition of Quebec as “a distinct society”. While strongly endorsed by the First Ministers and most of Canada’s business and academic elites, it was vigorously opposed by Manning and Reform as well as by former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, former Newfoundland Premier Clyde Wells, Manitoba MLA Elijah Harper (an aboriginal leader), and the Bloc Quebecois in Quebec. Reform opposed the Accord on the grounds that it gave a much higher priority to Quebec’s constitutional interests than those of the west and that its Senate reform provisions were weak and inadequate. The party’s policy chief, Stephen Harper, prepared a broad sheet entitled “KNOw More” presenting the complete text of the Accord with its defects (from Reform’s perspective) circled in red. Several million copies of the broadsheet were distributed door to door by Reform’s embryonic constituency organizations and newly nominated candidates, giving them valuable experience in organizing the door to door campaigning required for election campaigns. On October 26, 1992 – referendum day – the Accord was defeated nationally, 54.3% of the voters voting No to 45.7% voting Yes, with a 71.8% voter turnout. The Accord was most strongly opposed in Quebec and the West, largely due to the efforts of the Bloc Quebecois and Reform.
In June, 1993, Prime Minister Mulroney resigned, to be replaced by Kim Campbell, who then called a federal election for October 25, 1993. Manning and Reform campaigned on the theme of “The West Wants In.” and the Reform agenda adopted at previous party conventions. When the results were in, Reform had received 2,559,245 votes and elected 52 members to the House of Commons – with Manning winning in Calgary Southwest, Stephen Harper winning in Calgary West, and Deborah Grey being returned in Beaver River. The Progressive Conservative Party of Canada was reduced to two seats, the greatest electoral defeat ever suffered by a major federal political party in Canada. 51 of Reform’s seats were in the west and Manning emerged as the principal political voice of the West and fiscal conservatism in the House of Commons.
Despite finishing second in the popular vote, Reform came up three seats short of becoming the Official Opposition, largely because the concentration of support for the sovereigntist Bloc Quebecois in Quebec was slightly stronger than the concentration of support for Reform in the West. However, the Liberal government under Jean Chrétien characterized Manning and Reform as their main opponent on non-Quebec matters. In 1995 when Bloc leader Lucien Bouchard's position as Opposition Leader granted him a meeting with visiting US President Bill Clinton, Manning was also given a meeting with Clinton to diffuse Bouchard's separatist leverage.
The Parliamentary Years
The 1993 Liberal Red Book containing its election platform scarcely mentioned deficit and debt reduction, but Reform had gained over 2.5 million votes campaigning heavily on the need to balance the federal budget, Much of Manning’s and Reform’s energy in the 35th Parliament was therefore focused on pressuring the Chretien government on this issue and in 1998 the federal budget was at last balanced for the first time in years.
Manning and Reform also continued to pressure the government on the issue of Senate reform, but the Liberals argued that this could only be accomplished by a constitutional amendment and that the country was weary of constitutional matters. On April 20, 1998, Manning gave the longest and most comprehensive speech on Senate reform given in the House of Commons in the 20th century. In it he described in graphic detail the major defects of the Senate and the inappropriate, patronage infected behavior of many of its members. He then reviewed all the previous major attempt at Senate reform and the reasons for their failure, concluding with the case for Reform’s Triple E Senate. The government was unmoved, and Senate reform was not pursued in earnest again until the Harper government introduced Senate reform legislation embodying two thirds of the Triple E Senate concept in 2007. When referred to the Supreme Court, however, the court ruled that the federal government could not unilaterally make the changes contained in the bill and once again Senate reform was stalled indefinitely.
During Reform’s first term, several of its members and spokespersons made offensive and politically incorrect remarks which enabled its opponents to label it as extreme and undisciplined. On some occasions Manning was obliged to apologize on behalf of the party; on other occasions he dismissed criticisms by saying “A bright light sometimes attracts a few bugs.” Manning allowed his members considerable liberty in voting in the House of Commons, especially on matters not central to the Reform platform. While “freer voting for members of parliament” was a plank in the Reform platform, its exercise in practice frequently led to headlines such as “ Reform Divided” and damaged rather than enhance Manning’s efforts to push “democratic reforms.”
Because Reform had been created to address domestic challenges, it had no well defined foreign policy before arriving in parliament. This gradually evolved over the following years, with the western orientation of the party significantly influencing its foreign policy interests. Although Manning occasionally visited Europe and Washington, his more frequent foreign trips took him to the Pacific Rim – in particular, China, India, Pakistan, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.
The greatest crisis encountered by the federal parliament during Manning’s and Reform’s first term was the Quebec referendum on secession held on October 30, 1995. Lucien Bouchard had used his two years as Leader of the Opposition in the federal parliament to promote the cause of “ sovereignty association” – a more euphemistic definition of secession – and public support for that position in Quebec was increasing. Manning was severely hampered in discussing the issue by his inability to speak French, so his bilingual Constitution critic, Stephen Harper, took a leading role in advancing the Reform position. From Manning’s perspective, the position of the Chretien government’ position on federalism was that “the status quo is good enough”. Federalism was working well and Quebeckers simply needed to be convinced that they were better off in Canada as it was than in going it alone. Manning argued with Chretien (mainly in private rather than in public) that when competing with a “dream” – Bouchard’s dream of sovereignty association – the federalists needed a better dream, not a dry, unemotional alternative like “the status quo is good enough”. What Manning and Reform wanted was for the federal government to advance the dream of a ”reformed federalism” – one characterized by greater decentralization– which would address the constitutional concerns of both Quebec and the West. Manning and Harper also demanded a much clearer position on what constituted a large enough majority vote in the Quebec referendum to justify acceptance by the Rest of Canada of the breakup of the country. Harper and the Reform research staff prepared a list of “twenty hard questions” the government would have to answer immediately if Quebec were to vote Yes to separation. Chretien and the Liberals condemned all of Reform’s initiatives as not only unhelpful but characterized them as a deliberate attempt to aid the sovereigntist cause as the West would have greater influence in a Canada without Quebec.
Manning has described the night of October 30, 1995, as his “worst night in Ottawa and federal politics”, as the results came in on the referendum vote. When the final ballots had been counted, Quebecers rejected the sovereignty association option by the narrowest of margins - the No option receiving 50.58% of the 4,671, 008 votes cast, only 54,288 more than the total Yes vote. From Manning’s perspective, the Chretien administration and the 35th Parliament had barely escaped, by the skin of their teeth, going down as the federal administration and parliament that presided over the disintegration of Canadian confederation.
Four years later, following a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada on the conditions which a referendum on secession would have to meet in order to be legally legitimate the Chretien Government passed the Clarity Act, which became law in June 2000. While usually attributed to Liberal cabinet minister Stéphane Dion, then Minister for Intergovernmental Affairs, it shared much in common with a private member’s bill ( C-341– An Act to establish the terms and conditions that must apply to a referendum relating to the separation of Quebec from Canada before it may be recognized as a proper expression of the will of the people of Quebec) - that had been drafted by Stephen Harper and introduced in the House by Manning in 1996. At the time, it was bitterly denounced and opposed as unhelpful by the Chretien government.
On June 2, 1997, the next federal general election was held. Support for the Bloc declined in Quebec, the party winning 44 seats, down 10 from the previous election. This time Reform won 19.1% of the popular vote (2, 513, 070 votes) and 60 seats, all in the west, compared with 18.8% of the popular vote for the Progressive Conservatives (2, 446, 705 votes) and 20 seats. The gains by Reform were sufficient to make Manning Leader of the Official Opposition in the 36th Parliament. But vote splitting between Reform and the Progressive Conservative Party continued to hand scores of federal seats, especially in Ontario, to the federal Liberals, who again formed a majority government.
The Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance
The 1997 federal election convinced Manning and others that the continued vote splitting between Reform and the Progressive Conservatives needed to be addressed if Canada was to ever get a conservative oriented federal government. At the May 1998 Reform Convention in London, Ontario, Manning therefore propose an effort to create a United Alternative to the Liberals and a process for exploring the possibility of bringing Reform and the Progressive Conservatives together. A resolution endorsing the United Alternative proposal was then debated and passed by a vote of 91% in favor.
The subsequent United Alternative initiative was aided by the departure of Jean Charest from the leadership of the federal Progressive Conservatives to pursue provincial politics in Quebec and by the support of provincial progressive conservative Premiers, in particular, Mike Harris of Ontario, Gary Filmon of Manitoba, and Ralph Klein in Alberta. The process for achieving it, under Manning’s leadership, was incremental, beginning with the creation of a United Alternative Steering Committee involving representatives of both parties and the convening of an initial United Alternative Conference. The Conference was held in February, 1999, and attended by 1,500 delegates including both Reform and PC representatives.
On the urging of Manning and others, the Conference endorsed an action plan to create a new federal political party, its constitution, principles, and platform to be determined at a second United Alternative convention prior to June 30, 2000. In keeping with its grass roots consultative tradition, the executive of the Reform Party then scheduled a referendum among party members on the question, “Should the Reform Party of Canada continue with the United Alternative process – Yes or No?” Besides carrying on his duties as Official Opposition Leader, Manning then went on an extensive, cross country campaign to convince Reformers to vote Yes. On June 10, 1999, 60.5% of the participating Reform members voted Yes, to continuing the UA process – enough support for Manning to continue to press the UA option, but enough internal opposition to indicate that there were still many obstacles to be overcome.
In January 2000, the second United Alternative Conference was held, with Manning keeping a low profile so as not to convey the impression that the exercise was really just a Reform “take over” of the federal Progressive Conservatives. Major speeches in favor of creating the new party were therefore given by Stockwell Day, Alberta’s Progressive Conservative Finance Minister, and Tom Long, a well known lieutenant of Ontario’s Progressive Conservative Premier, Mike Harris. This convention, after vigorous debate, approved the constitutional framework and platform for a new party, to be named the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance.
Immediately following the second UA Conference, the Reform Party held a one-day conference of its own. It reviewed the results of the UA conference and was required by its constitution to vote on whether it approved or disapproved of Manning’s continued leadership. Reform delegates were asked again if they wished to continue the UA process, and if they did so, to authorize a final referendum among Reform Party members as to whether or not to become part of the Canadian Alliance. Manning gave yet another major address in support of “political realignment”. It was entitled “Think Big”and was nationally televised, aimed as much at the Canadian electorate as at Reformers. The motion to hold a second referendum was subsequently carried. The vote endorsing Manning’s continued leadership of the Reform Party also carried by 73% in favor. While this support level for Manning’s leadership was substantial, it was also evident that he was slowly using up his personal political capital in pushing the realignment agenda.
Believing that the best way to convince Reformers to support the Canadian Alliance was to demonstrate that the Alliance and its platform were saleable to the Canadian people, Manning launched another 6-week cross country tour aimed at convincing general audiences, not just Reformers, of the merits of the concept. On March 25, 2000, a large crowd of Reformers assembled at the Palliser hotel in Calgary to receive the results of the second party referendum. 91.5% of the participating members from across the country voted in the affirmative – the Reform Party of Canada ceased to exist and the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance officially came into being.
Immediately following the vote, Manning advised the Speaker of the House of Commons that all Reform members of Parliament should now be recognized as members of the Canadian Alliance and that Deborah Grey would serve as interim leader of the official opposition until a leader of the Alliance was chosen.
Exhausted by three years of constant campaigning to create the “united alternative”, Manning and his supporters now prepared to engage in yet another campaign – for the leadership of the newly created Canadian Alliance. It was to be decided by a vote of the Alliance membership using a preferential ballot and to be completed by July 8, 2000 The slogan adopted by the Manning Team for this campaign was “PM4PM”. Manning had resigned his position as Leader of the Opposition to combat the charge that it gave him an unfair advantage over other contestants for the Alliance leadership. Because it was important that the Alliance leadership be contested by prominent Progressive Conservatives, not just by Reformers, Manning welcomed the entry of Stockwell Day, the Alberta cabinet minister, into the contest. Because it was equally important that the leadership contest involve a prominent Progressive Conservative from Ontario, so that the Alliance did not appear to be totally western dominated, both Manning and Day also welcomed Tom Long’s entry.
The Canadian Alliance leadership contest itself lasted 3 months in which the contenders crisscrossed the country numerous times and grew the membership of the Canadian Alliance to over 200,000 members, When the results of the first ballot were announced on June 24, 2000, Stockwell Day has received 44% of the vote (53,249 votes out of 120,557), with Manning receiving 36% and Long 18%. When the results of the second ballot were counted on July 8, 2000, the vote was 64% for Day and 36% for Manning. Stockwell Day became the leader of the Canadian Alliance and Leader of the Official Opposition in parliament. Manning’s role as a political party and opposition leader was over. As he ruefully remarked, “The operation was a success but the doctor died.”
The Conservative Party of Canada
In the fall of 2000, the Liberals called an early election vigorously contested by the Canadian Alliance and its new Leader. But although Day, Manning, and other key Reformers were re-elected the Alliance won only 66 seats. Manning served briefly in the 37th parliament as his party’s critic for Science and Technology. But it was felt that his presence as a former leader hampered Day’s leadership efforts and he resigned his seat in January 2002.
After considerable internal dissension, Day resigned as Canadian Alliance leader to be replaced by Stephen Harper who had re-entered federal politics after remaining aloof during the party’s formation. Negotiations were then undertaken between Harper and Peter MacKay, who had assumed the leadership of that faction of the Progressive Conservative Party which had not joined the Alliance. In the fall of 2003 an agreement in principle was reached to merge the two parties to create the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). In March of 2004, the leadership of the CPC was won by Stephen Harper.
Manning took no formal part in the creation of the CPC, devoting himself to building “the conservative movement” (see below) as distinct from its partisan manifestations. Nor did he play a prominent role in the next three federal elections, although he continued to support the CPC in principle and provide advice and support to individual candidates.
The CPC – building on foundations laid by Reform, the Alliance, and the Progressive Conservative Party - continued to make electoral progress. In the January 2006 federal election it won 124 seats compared to 103 for the Liberals and formed its first minority government with Harper as Prime Minister. Seeking a majority, Harper asked the Governor General to dissolve the House in September 2008. In the subsequent October election, the CPC won 143 seats – still 12 seats short of a majority. Early in 2011, when the 3 opposition parties rejected the government’s proposed budget, Harper again asked the Governor General to dissolve the House. This time, in the May 2011 election, the CPC won 166 seats, sufficient to form a majority government. In that election, the Liberals won the fewest federal seats in their history, and were reduced to third party status.
While Manning himself was not directly involved in the formation or activities of the Harper government, he took pride in two things: that a number of the principles and policies first espoused by Reform had been included in the CPC constitution and platform; and that 18 of those who served as cabinet ministers in the Harper administration were first recruited and elected to parliament under the Reform and Alliance banners.
Critics of Manning and Reform have accused him and his associates as being right wing extremists, dangerous populists, narrow provincialists, closet separatists, anti-French, and religious fanatics.
Most commentary on Manning and his Reform Party ignores his political thinking and portrays him in terms of traditional western-based political protest movements. Sigurdson (1994) argues that Manning should be regarded instead as a postmodern conservative whose politics are a response to the process of postmodernization that has characterized Canada in recent years.
Manning himself has said that the greatest contribution of Reform to national politics was to demonstrate that, despite all the flaws and shortcomings of Canadians democracy, a small group of people with limited resources could still take the tools that democracy gives to all Canadians – freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom to persuade electors to vote this way or that – and change, at least to some degree, the composition and direction of the parliament and the policies of the national government.
Post Parliamentary Years
Upon his retirement from parliament, Manning and his associates established two, not-for-profit, organizations – the Manning Foundation for Democratic Education and the Manning Centre for Building Democracy – with Manning serving as the President and CEO of both. The purpose of both organizations is to strengthen democracy in Canada, in accordance with conservative values and principles.
Manning distinguishes between conservative political parties and the “conservative movement” with both the Foundation and the Centre being movement organizations. Their purpose is to strengthen democracy and conservatism in Canada by facilitating the generation of intellectual capital through the support of think tanks and idea generators; by facilitating the development of human resources for the political process through education and training.and to facilitate networking among the various components of the movement through communications and conferencing. The signature event of the Manning Centre is its Networking Conference held in Ottawa each year.
The principal themes on which Manning has written, lectured, and consulted on since leaving parliament and partisan responsibilities have included:
Securing greater freedom of choice for Canadians with respect to health, education, and social services – the three largest components of provincial government budgets.
Strengthening relations between the scientific and political communities (Manning is a founding supporter and promoter of the annual Canadian Science Policy Conference)
Equipping faith oriented Canadians to participate wisely and graciously in democratic politics.
Understanding populism from the perspective of Western Canada’s extensive experience with that political phenomenon
Beyond “left-centre-right” politics; redefining political space for next generation Canadians
Harnessing market mechanisms (pricing systems, financial incentives, entrepreneurship) to environmental conservation as an alternative to massive macro and micro environmental regulation by governments
Addressing poverty and economic inequalities by securing a broader distribution of the Tools of Wealth Creation, rather than relying solely on income redistribution through progressive taxation.
Market capitalism vs. State Directed Capitalism: Citizen Directed Democracy vs. State Directed Democracy: Winning the Ideological Battle with Communist China.
In July, 2016, Manning resigned from his executive functions with the Foundation and Centre, although he continues to support and pursue its objectives in his role as Founder. He is succeeded as Managing Director of the Centre of by Richard (Rick) Anderson, a longtime colleague and member of the Centre and Foundation boards.
Together with former Ontario Premier Mike Harris, Manning co-authored a six volume study and publication for the Fraser Institute and Montreal Economic Institute entitled “VISION for a Canada Strong and Free.” (2007) Manning is also a frequent contributor of columns to The Globe and Mail and is the author of five books: The New Canada (1990); Think Big: My Adventures in Life and Politics (2002); A Horse for Mr. Lincoln (a fictional story privately published in 2016); Faith, Leadership, and Public Life (2017); and Unfinished Political Business (to be published in 2018-19)
Favorite Quotations – Used Most Frequently or Paraphrased in His Speeches
“Behold I send you out as sheep among wolves. Therefore, be ye wise as serpents and harmless as doves.”- Jesus of Nazareth
“Just because a few grasshoppers under a fern can make the field ring with their importunate chirping, whilst thousands of great cattle repose beneath (the trees) and are silent, pray do not believe that those who make the noise are the only inhabitants of the field.”- Edmund Burke
“A state without the means of some change (reform) is without the means of its conservation. Without such means it might even risk the loss of that part of the constitution that it wished the most religiously to preserve.” – Edmund Burke
“I can think of no safer depositary for the ultimate powers of society than in the people themselves. And if you think them not fit to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion.” – Thomas Jefferson
“(Let us) here highly resolve … that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and that government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” – Abraham Lincoln
“Those of us who make the laws, and those of us who administer the laws, must keep the laws, or we lose our moral authority to govern.” – Ernest C. Manning
Honors and Awards
Manning has served as a Fellow of the Canada West Foundation, the Fraser Institute, the Marketplace Institute of Regent College (UBC) and as a Distinguished Visitor at the University of Toronto and the University of Calgary. He is the recipient of honorary degrees from the University of Toronto, York University, McMaster Divinity School, Tyndale University, the University of Alberta, the University of Calgary, the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology, the University of British Columbia, and Trinity Western University.
In 2007 Manning was appointed a Companion of the Order of Canada (OC). In 2012 he was made a member of the Alberta Order of Excellence (AOE) and in 2013 he was made a member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada (PC). His citation as a Companion of the Order of Canada – whose motto is “They desire a better country” – reads as follows:
“Preston Manning has devoted his life to public service. Rising to prominence as founder of the Reform Party and leader of the Official Opposition, he steadfastly worked to give voice to the concerns of many Canadians and has tirelessly championed the cause of democratic and political reform. Since his retirement from politics, he has continued his contribution to public policy dialogue through his involvement with numerous research and consulting organizations, including the Fraser Institute, the Canada West Foundation, and the Manning Centre for Building Democracy, which he founded in 2005”
Please direct any speaking inquiries to firstname.lastname@example.org